Harris/Law

Welcome to the profile of Harris/Law, a legal practice situated at 32 Old Slip in the Financial District of New York City. As a listed member of the 'Nearby Lawyers' category, Harris/Law, associated with attorney Steven Harrison, offers legal services to the local community. It is important for prospective clients to consider the range of feedback available regarding this firm to make an informed decision about their legal representation needs.

Located in the bustling Financial District, the office of Harris/Law is positioned within a central and accessible area of New York City. While specific details about the office environment are not provided, it is generally expected that a law firm in this district would maintain a professional setting for client meetings and legal proceedings. However, the available client reviews offer contrasting perspectives on the overall client experience and operational practices of the firm.

Based on the customer feedback, Harris/Law appears to have a history of representing clients in various types of legal matters. One long-term client shared positive experiences, recalling successful outcomes in a case against NYC correctional facilities and a car accident case. This reviewer expressed strong recommendations for Steven Harrison and indicated ongoing legal representation with the firm. These testimonials suggest that, for some clients, Harris/Law has provided effective legal counsel and achieved favorable results.

However, a more extensive and detailed review presents a significantly different perspective. This client, who engaged Harris Law for over two years, described their experience as a "giant mistake" and the firm as "absolutely the WORST law firm I ever encountered." The review raises several serious concerns regarding the firm's operational style, communication practices, and billing procedures. These allegations warrant careful consideration for potential clients.

The negative review details several specific issues, including unilateral decision-making without client approval, a perceived lack of care for client opinions, and difficulties in dismissing the firm due to concerns about legal bills. The client felt "stuck" despite disagreements with the firm's actions and likened having Harris Law as their attorney to "torture." Allegations were also made regarding threats of withdrawal coupled with billing for time spent to date if the client objected too much.

Further criticisms included a lack of urgency in handling matters, frequent errors, and overlooking obvious details. The reviewer also claimed that management was non-existent and reactive rather than proactive, with a lack of concern for client dissatisfaction. A serious accusation of "accounting impropriety" was made, involving clients being charged interest on all disbursements, even estimates, without proper substantiation despite legal requirements. Requests for substantiation were allegedly met with resistance, requiring clients to visit the office to view back-ups under supervision, and routine documents like depositions and research reports were reportedly withheld.

The negative review also raised concerns about the experience level of the lawyers assigned to the account over the two-year period, with many having less than a year of experience. Patterns of lack of disclosure, poor communication, zero strategy, and last-minute explanations of implications were noted. The client further alleged that Harris Law held them "hostage," forcing acceptance of settlements below market value due to a lack of foresight and a tendency to cut corners without correcting errors. The reviewer also expressed suspicion about two five-star reviews lacking explanation, suggesting they might be "shill reviews," and concluded with strong warnings to "stay away" due to "shoddy business practices" and described the firm as a "disgrace."

Given the stark contrast between the positive and negative feedback, it is challenging to provide a definitive overview of the services offered by Harris/Law. Based on the positive review, the firm appears to handle personal injury cases, such as car accidents and cases against correctional facilities. The negative review does not specify the area of law for which they were represented, but the issues raised pertain to general practices applicable across various legal domains.

In terms of features, the positive review highlights successful case outcomes and a long-standing client relationship, suggesting a level of effectiveness and client satisfaction in those instances. However, the extensive negative review paints a picture of serious deficiencies in communication, client involvement, operational efficiency, and billing practices. Potential clients must weigh these contrasting perspectives carefully.

Currently, there is no promotional information available for Harris/Law. The conflicting client experiences presented in the reviews do not provide a basis for identifying any specific positive features or promotional incentives offered by the firm. Therefore, individuals considering engaging Harris/Law should focus on the direct feedback provided by past clients and conduct thorough due diligence.

For local users in the Financial District and surrounding areas of New York City who are searching for a "Nearby Lawyer," the information available about Harris/Law presents a mixed picture. While one client reports positive, long-term experiences and successful case outcomes, another provides a detailed and highly critical account of their time with the firm. Potential clients should carefully consider both perspectives, particularly the serious allegations made in the negative review regarding communication, billing, and client involvement.

In conclusion, Harris/Law, located in the Financial District of New York City, has received both positive and strongly negative feedback from clients. While some individuals have reported successful outcomes and satisfaction with the services provided by Steven Harrison and his associates, others have raised significant concerns about the firm's practices, including communication, client involvement, billing, and overall professionalism. Prospective clients should carefully review all available information and consider conducting thorough due diligence before making a decision regarding legal representation with Harris/Law. The contrasting experiences suggest a need for caution and detailed inquiry into the firm's current practices and client management approach.