Schiller David A

Within our 'Nearby Lawyers' platform category, we aim to provide local users with information about legal service providers in their vicinity. This overview focuses on Schiller David A, an attorney with an office located at 204 Monroe St #109, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. It is important to present an objective picture based on the information available on the internet, including direct feedback from individuals who have engaged his services.

Schiller David A can be contacted at phone number (301) 315-0801 or mobile phone +1 301-315-0801. His office is situated in a commercial building in Rockville, Maryland. While specific details about the office environment, such as size or amenities, are not provided in the available data, the location in a commercial building suggests a standard professional setting for a legal practice.

Based on the limited customer reviews available, it appears that Schiller David A handles criminal cases. One reviewer describes him as "the best and professional and very helpful for any criminal case experience," recommending him to others seeking an "excellent lawyer." This positive review also highlights his perceived genuineness, loyalty, reasonable fees, and dedication to his work.

However, another review presents a significantly contrasting experience. This client initially had a "pleasant" interaction with David Schiller, forming a positive impression that he would be dedicated and caring. However, the reviewer states that "few months later," Mr. Schiller allegedly began "blatantly dodging" their calls, which the client claims to have confirmed by calling from a different phone number. Additionally, this client reports that Mr. Schiller seemed to have memory issues, asking for identification and case details at the start of every call. A specific point of concern raised by this reviewer involves an ankle monitor that was a financial burden. The client states they discussed the possibility of removal with Mr. Schiller, who allegedly said nothing could be done. Subsequently, after consulting other lawyers, the client claims to have learned that a motion to modify could have been filed. This reviewer strongly suggests others "staying away from him."

Considering these two contrasting reviews, it is challenging to definitively characterize the services, features, and overall client experience provided by Schiller David A. The positive review highlights professionalism, helpfulness in criminal cases, genuineness, loyalty, reasonable fees, and dedication. In contrast, the negative review raises serious concerns about communication, responsiveness, memory issues, and potentially a lack of thoroughness in exploring all available legal options (specifically regarding the motion to modify).

There is no information available regarding any specific promotional offers or unique features of the Law Office of Schiller David A. Potential clients must weigh the positive feedback against the serious allegations of poor communication and potential oversight in legal strategy presented in the negative review.

For local users seeking legal representation in the 'Nearby Lawyers' category, particularly for criminal cases in the Rockville, Maryland area, the available feedback on Schiller David A presents a mixed picture. While one client had a positive experience, the other reported significant issues with communication and the handling of their case. It is crucial for potential clients to consider both perspectives and conduct further due diligence before making a decision.

Given the limited and conflicting nature of the available information, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive overview of the environment, services, and features of Schiller David A's practice. Potential clients are strongly advised to conduct their own thorough research, which may include seeking additional reviews from other sources, verifying Mr. Schiller's standing with the Maryland State Bar Association, and contacting his office directly for a consultation to discuss their specific legal needs and assess his suitability for their case. It would be prudent to ask detailed questions about communication protocols, case management strategies, and experience in handling cases similar to their own.

In conclusion, this overview of Schiller David A, based on the limited publicly available customer feedback, reveals both a positive account of professionalism and helpfulness in criminal cases and a negative account detailing significant concerns about communication and case handling. Local users considering engaging Mr. Schiller's services should carefully weigh these contrasting experiences and undertake thorough personal research to make an informed decision about their legal representation.