Roland Richard Acevedo

For local users seeking legal representation through the "Nearby Lawyers" platform category, the profile of Roland Richard Acevedo, located at 27 Whitehall St 5th floor in New York, NY 10004, USA, presents an option to consider. He can be contacted at (212) 658-1970 or via mobile at +1 212-658-1970. While the platform aims to connect users with nearby legal professionals, the diverse experiences reported by previous clients of Roland Richard Acevedo warrant careful attention from anyone considering his services, regardless of their immediate geographical proximity.

Information regarding the specific environment of Roland Richard Acevedo's office is not provided in the available client reviews. Typically, law offices strive to create a professional and confidential setting for client meetings and legal work. However, in the absence of any descriptive feedback about the office space, local users may wish to inquire about the environment during their initial contact, should this be a relevant factor in their decision-making process.

The precise areas of legal service offered by Roland Richard Acevedo are not explicitly detailed in the provided reviews. One client's negative experience suggests potential issues with case management and communication after the initial engagement. This client mentioned a failure to fulfill statements in the retainer agreement and a lack of file creation, implying a potential focus on a particular area where these issues arose, or perhaps broader challenges in organization and client communication. Conversely, a positive review highlights Mr. Acevedo's attentiveness ("listened to me and heard my side of the story"), supportiveness, empathy, and competence in arguing a case, along with treating the client with compassion and respect. This suggests proficiency in handling cases where client interaction and advocacy are crucial. For local users on the "Nearby Lawyers" platform, it is essential to directly inquire about Mr. Acevedo's specific areas of expertise to determine if they align with their legal needs. These areas might include personal injury, family law, criminal defense, or other legal specialties.

The client feedback reveals contrasting features of Roland Richard Acevedo's legal practice. One negative review points to significant concerns regarding communication and case management. The client reports difficulties in contacting Mr. Acevedo, citing frequent excuses for his unavailability, and expresses frustration at his perceived lack of time for the case despite having accepted payment. The serious allegations of failing to fulfill the retainer agreement and not even creating a case file raise red flags about potential organizational and professional conduct. The reviewer also suggests that positive ratings for Mr. Acevedo might be misleading. This paints a picture of potential unreliability and poor client communication.

In stark contrast, the positive review emphasizes several commendable features. Mr. Acevedo is described as "good-hearted, honest and hardworking," indicating a positive personal character. His ability to listen and support the client's perspective, his empathy, responsiveness to concerns, and his dedication to fighting for the client's case are highlighted as significant strengths. The reviewer also praises his legal knowledge and competence in arguing a case effectively. Furthermore, his compassionate and respectful treatment of the client during a difficult time is noted as a valuable asset. This review suggests a lawyer who is caring, dedicated, and legally capable. The strong recommendation ("I would whole-heartedly recommend him to anybody!") underscores a highly positive client experience.

The promotional information available is derived solely from the two contrasting client reviews. The positive review serves as a strong testimonial, promoting Mr. Acevedo's empathy, dedication, legal competence, and respectful client interactions. The reviewer's wholehearted recommendation acts as a powerful endorsement. However, this positive promotion is significantly countered by the negative review, which details a severely unsatisfactory experience, raising concerns about communication, case management, and overall professionalism. For local users on the "Nearby Lawyers" platform, these conflicting accounts highlight the importance of considering both positive and negative feedback when making a decision. The suggestion in the negative review that positive ratings might be misleading further underscores the need for careful evaluation and potentially seeking additional information or references.

For local users considering Roland Richard Acevedo based on his listing in the "Nearby Lawyers" category, the available client feedback presents a dilemma. The positive review suggests a lawyer who is caring, competent, and dedicated to his clients. However, the negative review raises serious concerns about his availability, communication, and case management practices. Potential clients should carefully weigh these contrasting experiences. It might be prudent to contact Mr. Acevedo's office to discuss their specific legal needs and to inquire about his current availability and case management procedures. Asking for references or seeking additional reviews from other sources, if available, could also provide a more comprehensive understanding of his professional conduct and client satisfaction levels. Given the significant discrepancy in the provided feedback, proceeding with caution and conducting thorough due diligence is advisable.

In conclusion, the profile of Roland Richard Acevedo on the "Nearby Lawyers" platform is accompanied by strongly contrasting client experiences. One review praises his empathy, dedication, legal skills, and respectful treatment, offering a wholehearted recommendation. Conversely, another review details a very negative experience characterized by poor communication, frequent unavailability, failure to adhere to the retainer agreement, and a lack of basic case management. For local users considering his services, these conflicting accounts necessitate a careful and thorough evaluation. Direct communication with Mr. Acevedo's office to discuss their specific needs and concerns, along with seeking additional information or references if possible, is strongly recommended to make an informed decision. The significant disparity in client feedback underscores the importance of comprehensive research when selecting legal representation.