Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg

For individuals and families in the New York, NY area seeking legal assistance, particularly in matters related to education law, the Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg, situated at 111 John St 22nd floor, New York, NY 10038, USA, appears as a local option within the "Nearby Lawyers" category. This introduction aims to provide potential clients with an objective overview of this law practice, primarily based on the publicly available customer reviews. It is crucial to note that the feedback is overwhelmingly negative and raises significant concerns about the firm's services and client relations.

While information regarding the specific office environment of the Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg is not provided in the reviews, one can generally expect a law office in a commercial building in New York City to have standard features such as consultation rooms, administrative areas, and a reception desk. The 22nd-floor location on John Street in the Financial District suggests a professional setting within a central area of Manhattan, potentially accessible by public transportation.

Based on the firm name and the context of the reviews, the Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg appears to specialize in education law. The comments suggest that their services may include:

• Special Education Law: Representing families of children with disabilities in matters related to Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), school placement, and services provided by the Department of Education (DOE).
• Interactions with the Department of Education: Assisting families in navigating the complexities of the New York City public school system.
• School Transfers: As mentioned in one review, a potential service offered is facilitating the transfer of students to different schools within the DOE system.

However, it is imperative to consider the strong negative sentiments expressed in the customer reviews, which paint a concerning picture of the firm's effectiveness and client service.

The overwhelming theme of the customer reviews is one of extreme dissatisfaction. Key issues raised by multiple reviewers include:

• Lack of Effort and Ineffective Representation: One reviewer details a specific case where the lead attorney allegedly failed to communicate effectively with opposing counsel and demonstrated a lack of knowledge of the law and inadequate preparation. This client also alleges potential legal malpractice and requests a refund of the retainer.
• Broken Promises: The same reviewer mentions a promise of a retainer refund that was not fulfilled.
• Questionable Effectiveness: Multiple reviewers label the firm as a "joke" and "impostors posing as educational lawyers," suggesting a perceived lack of competence in handling education law matters.
• Concerns about Motivation: One reviewer expresses the belief that the firm is not genuinely interested in pursuing justice for children, particularly in cases involving prejudice and racism within the DOE.
• Allegations of Prejudice and Racism: A particularly serious accusation is made by one reviewer who suggests that the firm, influenced by "white privileged world" perspectives, may inadvertently support the segregation of Black students and is unwilling to challenge systemic racism within the DOE. This reviewer strongly advises people of color to avoid the firm.
• Free Information Provided as Paid Service: Several reviewers point out that the advice received from the firm, such as suggesting a school transfer, was basic information readily available for free, questioning the value of their paid services.
• Poor Communication and Lack of Follow-Through: The initial negative review highlights a lack of returned calls and overall poor communication.
• Suspect Positive Reviews: One reviewer suggests that any positive five-star reviews are likely from paid individuals, further undermining the credibility of any positive feedback.
• Recommendation to Seek Alternatives: Multiple reviewers explicitly advise others not to waste their time or money on this firm and recommend seeking help from other organizations like Advocates For Children of NYC (AFC) or even using online resources like Google or Siri for information.

Given the consistency and severity of the negative feedback across multiple reviews, potential clients should approach the Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg with extreme caution. The issues raised pertain to fundamental aspects of legal representation, including competence, communication, client service, and even ethical considerations.

In light of the overwhelmingly negative reviews, it is challenging to identify any genuine promotional information or features that would be beneficial to local users. The recurring themes of ineffectiveness, poor communication, and even allegations of prejudice significantly outweigh any potential positives. The reviews themselves serve as a strong warning against engaging the services of this firm.

For individuals and families in New York, NY, seeking legal assistance in education law, particularly those dealing with complex issues such as special education, IEPs, or allegations of discrimination within the DOE, the strong recommendations in the reviews to seek alternative legal resources should be heeded. The Advocates For Children of NYC (AFC) is specifically mentioned as a helpful organization. Potential clients should prioritize law firms with a demonstrable track record of positive client experiences and a reputation for effective advocacy in education law.

In conclusion, the Law Offices of Neal H Rosenberg in New York, NY, has received overwhelmingly negative feedback from online reviewers. The concerns raised include allegations of ineffective representation, poor communication, failure to deliver promised services, and even serious accusations of prejudice. Local users seeking legal assistance in education law are strongly advised to exercise extreme caution and consider the recommendations to explore alternative legal resources. Direct contact with the firm at (212) 732-9450 or +1 212-732-9450 should be undertaken with a clear understanding of the significant negative experiences reported by previous clients, and potential clients should conduct thorough due diligence before making any decisions.