Kim A Williams Law Offices

For local users seeking legal counsel under the "Nearby Lawyers" category in New York City, Kim A Williams Law Offices is located at 30 Vesey St # 2, New York, NY 10007, USA. While the office's physical presence provides a potential legal resource in the Manhattan area, it is crucial for prospective clients to consider all available information, including customer reviews, to make an informed decision about their legal representation. The following introduction aims to objectively present the information available on the internet regarding Kim A Williams Law Offices, without omitting any details, to assist local users in their evaluation process.

Information regarding the environment of Kim A Williams Law Offices is not explicitly detailed in the provided reviews. However, being situated at a specific address in a commercial building in New York City suggests a standard professional office setting. Clients can likely expect a space suitable for conducting legal consultations and managing case-related work. The specific atmosphere and resources within the office would be determined by the individual practice of Kim A Williams Law Offices.

The customer reviews offer insights, albeit critical, into the services and professional conduct associated with Kim A Williams Law Offices. One reviewer strongly advises others to "run as far away from this attorney as possible," citing personal interactions with Mrs. Williams that led to the belief that she is "dishonest and simply not good at her job." This is a severe assessment and should be carefully considered by potential clients. The reviewer also describes Mrs. Williams as "inarticulate," which could impact communication and understanding in legal proceedings.

Another, more detailed review provides a specific account of interactions with Mrs. Williams in the context of a probate proceeding. This reviewer indicates that while Mrs. Williams was not the attorney of record for the estate, she allegedly acted as the de facto spokesperson for matters related to a long-dormant estate. The reviewer claims that Mrs. Williams acted solely in the interest of her clients and inserted herself into matters that did not directly involve them. A specific instance cited is the alleged refusal to provide the reviewer with a copy of a Title Report to which they believed they were entitled under New York City's Surrogate Court Procedure Act. This raises concerns about transparency and adherence to legal procedures.

Furthermore, the reviewer recounts questioning Mrs. Williams about a potential conflict of interest arising from her representation of her clients while allegedly interfering with the estate. In response, Mrs. Williams is said to have accused the reviewer of "threatening" her and subsequently sent a cease and desist email. The reviewer points out an alleged procedural error, stating that cease and desist letters must be served in person under legal requirements. The reviewer questions the judgment of an attorney who would accuse someone of threatening them for asking pertinent questions related to a matter in which the attorney had involved herself. This account raises concerns about Mrs. Williams' understanding of legal protocol and her professional conduct in communication.

The same reviewer also alleges that Mrs. Williams filed objections to the reviewer being the administrator of the estate, despite the reviewer never having made such a request to the court. This action is described as costly and indicative of a potential lack of reading comprehension. This specific claim, if accurate, could suggest inefficiencies or misunderstandings in Mrs. Williams' handling of legal documents and court procedures.

The reviewer also mentions attaching images as evidence to their review. These include an alleged five-star review from a person sharing the same name as Mrs. Williams, raising questions about the authenticity and potential bias of that positive feedback. Additionally, the reviewer included an email from Mrs. Williams claiming that non-threatening emails were perceived as threatening. While email addresses were redacted, the reviewer asserts that the emails were otherwise unedited. The reviewer concludes by strongly advising others to "steer clear of this lawyer/real estate agent," suggesting a potential overlap in professional roles and further cautioning against engaging her services.

The final, very brief review simply states "The best." This stands in stark contrast to the overwhelmingly negative feedback provided by the other two reviewers. Without any context or specific details, it is difficult to ascertain the basis for this positive assessment or its relevance in light of the serious allegations made in the other reviews. It is important for potential clients to weigh all available feedback when considering legal representation.

Given the information available, there is no indication of specific promotional information or unique features being actively advertised by Kim A Williams Law Offices. The online presence, as reflected in these reviews, primarily consists of direct feedback from individuals who have interacted with the attorney. The strong negative sentiments expressed in the majority of the reviews could serve as a significant deterrent for potential clients. The one positive review, due to the shared name issue raised by another reviewer, lacks credibility and context. Therefore, there is no clear promotional message or feature to highlight based on the provided data.

For local users in the "Nearby Lawyers" category considering Kim A Williams Law Offices, it is strongly recommended to proceed with extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence. The significant negative feedback, including allegations of dishonesty, inarticulateness, procedural errors, and questionable professional conduct, should be carefully evaluated. Potential clients should consider seeking additional information, such as disciplinary records or further references, if available, before making a decision. Directly contacting the law office may provide an opportunity to hear Mrs. Williams' perspective; however, the discrepancies highlighted in the reviews warrant a high degree of scrutiny.

In conclusion, the available information regarding Kim A Williams Law Offices, located in New York, NY, primarily consists of critical customer reviews raising serious concerns about the attorney's professionalism, competence, and ethical conduct. While one brief positive review exists, its credibility has been questioned. Local users seeking legal representation in the "Nearby Lawyers" category are strongly advised to carefully consider this feedback and conduct thorough research before engaging the services of Kim A Williams Law Offices. The allegations made by multiple reviewers warrant significant caution and the exploration of alternative legal counsel.