Johnston Family Law
Nearby LawyersOregonWashington CountyBeavertonFive OaksNorthwest Bethany Boulevard
Open Hours:
Monday, 8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Tuesday, 8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Wednesday, 8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Thursday, 8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Friday, Closed
Saturday, Closed
Sunday, Closed
Johnston Family Law Introduce
Welcome to the local platform for Nearby Lawyers. If you are a resident or business in Beaverton, Oregon, seeking focused legal assistance in family law matters, we are pleased to introduce you to Johnston Family Law, located at 1500 NW Bethany Blvd #340, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA. You can reach their office by phone at (503) 226-7986 or via mobile at +1 503-226-7986.
While specific details about the interior environment of Johnston Family Law's office are not extensively available online, law offices in professional buildings typically aim to provide a private and comfortable setting for clients to discuss sensitive family law issues. Located on NW Bethany Boulevard in Beaverton, Suite 340 suggests a professional office space designed to facilitate confidential consultations and legal work. Clients can likely expect an environment where they feel secure and supported while navigating complex personal legal matters.
The available customer reviews offer valuable insights into the services provided by Johnston Family Law. One client expresses high satisfaction, stating they have had the privilege of being represented by Mr. Johnston on multiple occasions, with consistently successful outcomes. This reviewer describes Mr. Johnston as dedicated, knowledgeable, efficient, and the "best family law attorney" in their opinion. They also credit Mr. Johnston and his staff, Bobbi and Tora, for the successful resolution of their cases, indicating a competent and supportive team.
In contrast, a communication from the Oregon State Bar Client Assistance Office (CAO) regarding a complaint about Mr. Johnston's services provides a different perspective. The CAO's role is to review concerns regarding lawyer conduct in Oregon, specifically looking for potential violations of professional conduct rules. While they do not inquire into the quality of a lawyer's services or the reasonableness of fees (unless clearly excessive), they did address three concerns raised in the complaint.
The first concern involved the handling of payment for an appraisal, where the client felt they were not properly reimbursed by the opposing party as initially proposed. The CAO concluded that this issue pertained to the quality of services rather than misconduct, noting that a single mistake typically does not violate competence or diligence rules, although it could potentially constitute negligence and grounds for a legal malpractice claim. The CAO did not find this issue sufficient to warrant a referral to Disciplinary Counsel.
The second concern related to Mr. Johnston's courtroom performance, specifically his decision not to object to opposing counsel leading a witness. The CAO explained that such tactical decisions during trial are within the lawyer's professional judgment and will not be second-guessed by the bar unless they reflect a clear absence of reasonable professional skill and judgment. The CAO found that Mr. Johnston's actions in this regard did not constitute incompetent representation or a violation of ethical obligations.
Considering the available information, potential services and features of Johnston Family Law, primarily focusing on family law, may include:
- Dedicated Family Law Practice: The firm's name and the positive review emphasize their focus on family law matters.
- Experienced Representation: A client with multiple successful experiences suggests a seasoned and capable attorney in Mr. Johnston.
- Efficient and Direct Approach: Mr. Johnston is described as getting right to work and not wasting time.
- Knowledgeable in Family Law: The positive review specifically highlights Mr. Johnston's knowledge in this area.
- Supportive Staff: Mentions of Bobbi and Tora indicate a helpful and integral support team.
The strong positive testimonial from a repeat client serves as a significant form of promotion, highlighting successful outcomes and a positive client experience. This personal recommendation can be highly influential for local users seeking a reliable family law attorney in Beaverton. The mention of dedication and efficiency suggests that Johnston Family Law aims to provide effective and results-oriented legal services.
The Oregon State Bar CAO communication, while not a promotion, provides an objective assessment of specific complaints raised about Mr. Johnston's service. It's important for potential clients to understand that the bar distinguishes between quality of service issues (which may lead to malpractice claims) and ethical misconduct. The CAO's findings did not indicate misconduct warranting disciplinary action, but they do highlight areas where a client felt there were shortcomings in service.
For local users in the Nearby Lawyers category seeking assistance with family law matters in Beaverton, Johnston Family Law presents a practice with a strong endorsement from at least one client. However, the information from the Oregon State Bar also suggests the importance of clear communication and thorough attention to all aspects of a case. Potential clients should weigh both the positive testimonial and the issues raised in the bar communication when considering their options.
To gain a comprehensive understanding of the services offered by Johnston Family Law and to assess whether their approach aligns with your individual needs and expectations in a family law case, it is recommended to contact their office directly. A consultation can provide an opportunity to discuss your specific situation, understand their processes, and determine if they are the right legal advocate for you in Beaverton, Oregon. Asking about their experience with cases similar to yours and their communication practices can help you make an informed decision.
In conclusion, Johnston Family Law in Beaverton, OR, appears to be a dedicated family law practice with a history of successful outcomes for some clients. The positive testimonial highlights the attorney's dedication, knowledge, and efficiency, supported by a helpful staff. However, a communication from the Oregon State Bar CAO regarding a client complaint indicates that there have been concerns raised about the quality of service in specific instances. Local users seeking family law assistance in Beaverton should consider both the positive feedback and the issues raised in the bar communication when making their decision and are encouraged to contact the firm directly for more information.
Location
Customer Reviews
(6 reviews)
My review is long overdue, I have had the privilege of having Mr. Johnston represent me on multiple occasions, and each time he has never failed to deliver. He is dedicated, knowledgeable, gets right to work, doesn't waste time, and in my opinion is the best family law attorney. My cases would not have been successful if it were not for the help of Mr. Johnston and his staff. Thank you Mr. Johnston, Bobbi, and Tora.
OSB comment about his service The Oregon State Bar Client Assistance Office (CAO) has received your additional submissions to your complaint about the conduct of Ronald Johnston, a lawyer who represented you in domestic relations proceedings. The CAO is responsible for reviewing concerns regarding Oregon lawyers. Under Oregon State Bar Rule of Procedure 2.5 and as resources permit, CAO determines the manner and extent of review required to decide whether there is sufficient evidence to support a reasonable belief that lawyer misconduct may have occurred warranting a referral to Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Counsel. Misconduct means a violation of the rules of professional conduct and applicable statutes that govern lawyer conduct in Oregon. We do not make inquiry into the quality of a lawyer’s services. We also do not review the reasonableness of fees charged unless there is credible evidence that the fees are clearly excessive. You have expressed three concerns as discussed below. We conclude that there is no sufficient basis to warrant a referral to Disciplinary Counsel’s Office for further review. Your first concern is that Mr. Johnston failed to properly handle the issue of payment for an appraisal. Opposing counsel proposed that you pre-pay the full cost of the appraisal, and this would be equalized down the road. Apparently the issue was never properly revisited by Mr. Johnston, so you were not reimbursed. This is an issue concerning the quality of services, rather than misconduct. While both our competence and diligence rules touch on a lawyer’s errors or failure to attend to a legal matter, neither rule is violated by a single mistake. A single error, however, may constitute negligence, and a lawyer whose legal services fall below the standard of care in the community may be liable to the client for legal malpractice. If you feel you have a legal malpractice claim against Mr. Johnston, you may want to contact another attorney to explore what remedies are available to you. You or your new attorney may also want to contact the Professional Liability Fund, PO Box 231600, Tigard, OR 97281-1600. The PLF provides professional liability (malpractice) coverage to most attorneys in private practice in Oregon. However, I do not find this issue sufficient to raise questions as to misconduct under our rules. Your second concern relates to Mr. Johnston’s performance in court. You have noted that the court allowed opposing counsel to lead her witness in questioning, and Mr. Johnston did not object. This does not offend our rules, because matters such as what objections to make during trial are for the lawyer to decide based on the exercise of his professional judgment. The bar will not second-guess a lawyer’s tactical decisions unless those decisions reflect an absence or suspension of reasonable professional skill and judgment. That Mr. Johnston did not make objections you felt were warranted, or otherwise proceeded in a manner with which you disagree, does not mean that he provided incompetent representation or violated any other ethical obligation to you.
I would never hire someone to defend me in court that can't control their emotions in a car. He spend up and cut me off then slowed up. Learn to drive.
More Law Firms You May Be Interested In

Robert T. Manicke
760 SW 9th Ave. #3000, Portland, OR 97205, USA

Black Helterline LLP
805 SW Broadway # 1900, Portland, OR 97205, USA

Steve Smucker Esq. Plaintiff Personal Injury Lawyer
806 SW Broadway, Portland, OR 97205, USA

PortlandLawyer.com
806 SW Broadway #1200, Portland, OR 97205, USA

Dunn Carney LLP
851 SW 6th Ave #1500, Portland, OR 97204, USA

Karen R Thompson Attorney
851 SW 6th Ave Suite 1375, Portland, OR 97204, USA