Goldberg Weprin Introduce

Welcome to our platform for Nearby Lawyers, where we provide information to help you connect with legal professionals in your area. Today, we present an overview of Goldberg Weprin, a law firm situated at 125 Park Ave, on the 12th floor, in New York City, NY 10017, USA. Located in the Midtown Manhattan area, this firm occupies a space within a well-known commercial district. However, it is crucial to note that the available client reviews present significant concerns regarding their billing practices and overall client experience. This introduction aims to objectively summarize the information found in these reviews to help local users make informed decisions.

The physical environment of Goldberg Weprin, located on Park Avenue, suggests a presence within a prominent business and legal hub of New York City. The 12th-floor location likely offers a professional setting for conducting legal consultations and business operations. While specific details about the office ambiance and facilities are not provided, one can generally expect a standard office environment suitable for a law firm operating in this area. Accessibility to the office is likely convenient due to its Park Avenue address and proximity to major transportation links in Midtown Manhattan. However, the negative feedback regarding the firm's services raises important considerations that outweigh the potential benefits of its location.

Based on the limited information beyond the critical client reviews, the specific legal services offered by Goldberg Weprin are not detailed. One review mentions involvement in a landlord-tenant dispute, suggesting that this may be one area of their practice. However, without a comprehensive list of their practice areas, it is difficult to ascertain the full scope of their legal services. Potential clients should directly inquire about the firm's expertise in their specific legal needs. The negative reviews, particularly concerning billing and handling of a landlord-tenant case, serve as significant points of caution for prospective clients.

The features of Goldberg Weprin, as perceived through the lens of the available client feedback, are concerning. One client described their billing as a "fantasy" and accused the firm of padding bills with "outright fluff," suggesting a lack of transparency and potentially unethical billing practices. The same reviewer indicated that the firm spent excessive time in internal discussions, billing the client for time not directly related to substantive work on their case. Another review detailed a negative experience involving a landlord-tenant dispute where a substantial retainer fee was paid, followed by minimal contact and ultimately a recusal due to a conflict of interest (the validity of which was questioned by subsequent legal counsel). This recusal was reportedly at the client's expense, and a request for a partial refund resulted in a bill claiming the client owed the firm even more money. These accounts raise serious questions about the firm's client service, billing ethics, and case management.

Currently, there is no promotional information available for Goldberg Weprin. In light of the severely negative client reviews, any potential promotional claims would need to be carefully weighed against the reported experiences. The absence of positive feedback and the strong accusations of overbilling and poor client service should serve as a significant warning to local users considering this firm. It is strongly recommended that potential clients exercise extreme caution and thoroughly investigate other legal options before engaging Goldberg Weprin. The provided reviews suggest a pattern of behavior that could lead to financial disputes and dissatisfaction with the legal representation.

In conclusion, while Goldberg Weprin is located at a prominent address on Park Avenue in New York City, the available client feedback paints a concerning picture regarding their billing practices and client service. Accusations of padded bills, excessive billing for internal discussions, and mishandling of a landlord-tenant dispute, including a costly recusal and a disputed refund, should be taken very seriously by local users seeking legal representation. It is advised to proceed with extreme caution and consider seeking legal counsel from other firms with more positive and transparent client feedback. Contacting Goldberg Weprin directly may provide their perspective, but the consistency and severity of the negative reviews warrant significant skepticism.

When selecting a lawyer, especially in a city with numerous legal professionals, it is crucial to prioritize transparency and ethical billing practices. The reviews for Goldberg Weprin highlight the potential pitfalls of engaging a firm where billing is perceived as opaque or inflated. Always discuss billing rates and procedures upfront with any prospective lawyer and ensure you understand how you will be charged for their services. Requesting regular and detailed billing statements can help you track the time spent on your case and identify any discrepancies.

Furthermore, the importance of clear and consistent communication with your lawyer cannot be overstated. The negative review detailing minimal contact from the attorney after paying a substantial retainer is a serious concern. A good lawyer should keep you informed about the progress of your case, explain legal strategies clearly, and be responsive to your questions and concerns. A lack of communication can lead to anxiety and a feeling of being neglected during a stressful legal process.

The issue of conflict of interest, as raised in one of the reviews, is another critical aspect to consider when choosing legal representation. A lawyer has an ethical duty to avoid conflicts of interest that could compromise their ability to represent you impartially. While the specifics of the alleged conflict in the review are debated, it underscores the importance of discussing any potential conflicts with your lawyer at the outset of your engagement. A lawyer's decision to recuse themselves from a case, especially at the client's expense and after accepting a significant retainer, should be carefully scrutinized.

In light of the serious allegations made in the client reviews for Goldberg Weprin, local users are strongly advised to exercise due diligence and consider alternative legal counsel. The negative feedback regarding billing practices, communication, and case handling raises significant red flags. It is recommended to seek lawyers with a proven track record of ethical billing, effective communication, and positive client experiences. Consulting with multiple attorneys and checking their references or online reviews from reputable sources can help you make a more informed and confident decision about your legal representation.

Location

Customer Reviews

(9 reviews)

T
Todd Stevens
Apr 26, 2024

They are good lawyers, but their billing is a fantasy. The bills are padded with outright fluff. They spend more time talking amongst themselves and billing you for it, than they do actual work. I would never use them again, look elsewhere.

K
Kenneth Francis
Aug 01, 2023

I would give a zero star review, but it's not an option. I was involved in a landlord tenant dispute this past year and was referred to Goldberg Weprin, specifically Mr. Kevin Nash, the "pit bull" of L and T litigation. He promptly and avariciously (greedily) accepted our $10,000 retainer fee and assured us that we indeed had a legitimate and defensible case against our landlord. After minimal motion responses and submissions, and virtually NO personal contact with him Mr. Nash was challenged with a conflict of interest by the landlord plaintiff attorney as having performed "some" work for the landlord a full 10 years ago. I am told by my eventual representing attorneys that the statute on conflict is 7 years, maybe that's inaccurate?? Anyway, Mr. Nash decided that he wanted no part of arguing the conflict and submitted to the court a motion to recuse himself from the case, AT OUR EXPENSE OF COURSE. When asked for a refund of part of our retainer Mr. Nash returned a ridiculously trumped up bill that laughingly reported that we, in fact owed him $5000! This firm may carry a reputation, however, there is a threshold at which "you get what you pay for" morphs into "taking advantage of a client and ripping them off."

P
Paul Gerik
Oct 06, 2023

Make no mistake these guys are the best in the business

G
Gerard Tuitt
Jan 12, 2020

Great lawyer's

D
Dan Jay
Apr 21, 2024