Braverman Jo-Ann

Welcome to the platform for Nearby Lawyers. If you are a local user in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, seeking legal representation, Braverman Jo-Ann has an office located at 1500 Walnut St # 21. While information regarding the firm's environment and specific services is not detailed in the provided data, it is important for potential clients to consider all available feedback when making a decision about legal representation. Law offices typically aim to provide a professional setting for client consultations and legal work; however, the client experiences shared below offer direct insights into communication and service aspects of this particular practice.

Based on the available customer reviews, a significant concern raised by multiple individuals pertains to the responsiveness and communication practices of Braverman Jo-Ann. One reviewer explicitly states that this lawyer "does not return anyone’s calls in a timely fashion or even at all," claiming to have left over 30 missed calls and voicemails without a response. This lack of communication is a serious concern for any individual seeking legal assistance, as timely and consistent communication is often crucial for understanding the progress of a case and addressing any urgent matters. The reviewer strongly advises potential clients not to be represented by this attorney due to these communication issues.

Adding to these concerns, the same reviewer alleges that Braverman Jo-Ann "gives out confidential information to the wrong party without a care in the world," further stating that such action is against the law. This is an extremely serious accusation, as the confidentiality of client information is a fundamental principle of the attorney-client relationship and a legal and ethical obligation for lawyers. If these allegations are accurate, they would represent a significant breach of professional conduct and could have severe consequences for clients.

The reviewer also expresses disappointment, stating, "I hate that they allow people like her to represent our people," and suggests that "race definitely plays a big part in this." This is a subjective statement based on the reviewer's personal experience and perception. It is important to acknowledge this sentiment as part of the feedback received, but it is also crucial to maintain objectivity and recognize that individual experiences can vary, and such claims would require further substantiation to be considered factual on a broader scale.

Another reviewer also expresses significant dissatisfaction with the communication from Braverman Jo-Ann. This individual states that they had only one prior contact despite being told that the attorney should have contacted them months prior regarding a case she was being paid to handle. The reviewer indicates that they had to initiate contact themselves, which contradicts the expectation that the representing attorney would maintain proactive communication. Furthermore, this reviewer claims that Braverman Jo-Ann left messages demanding the removal of the negative review as a prerequisite for communication, implying a problematic approach to addressing client concerns.

This second reviewer explicitly states their intention to bring these communication issues and the alleged demand to remove the review to the attention of the courts and the city agency that employs Braverman Jo-Ann. This indicates a high level of dissatisfaction and a belief that the conduct is unprofessional and warrants official attention. The timeline provided by this reviewer suggests a significant delay in communication, with the case allegedly being assigned in June and the client having to reach out in October for the first contact.

Considering these two customer reviews, a clear pattern of concern emerges regarding Braverman Jo-Ann's communication practices and, in one instance, a serious allegation about the mishandling of confidential information. While these are individual experiences and do not represent a comprehensive overview of all clients' interactions, they are significant pieces of feedback that potential local users should carefully consider. As an objective introduction based on the available information, it is our responsibility to present these concerns as they have been expressed by individuals who have interacted with this legal professional.

Given the nature of the feedback, it is challenging to identify positive "features" or "promotional information" in the traditional sense. Instead, the prominent feature highlighted by these reviews is a significant lack of communication and alleged unprofessional conduct. For local users in Philadelphia seeking legal representation, this information serves as a critical point of consideration. While the office is located at 1500 Walnut St # 21 and can be reached at (215) 751-0322 or +1 215-751-0322, potential clients should weigh these communication concerns heavily when deciding whether to engage Braverman Jo-Ann for their legal needs. It would be prudent to seek further information or consider alternative legal counsel to ensure effective and ethical representation.

In conclusion, based on the customer reviews available online, Braverman Jo-Ann, an attorney with an office in Philadelphia, PA, has received significant negative feedback regarding a lack of timely communication, failure to return calls, and, in one instance, a serious allegation of disclosing confidential information inappropriately. These concerns should be carefully considered by local users seeking legal representation. While the provided address and phone number offer contact information, potential clients are strongly advised to proceed with caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging Braverman Jo-Ann for their legal matters, potentially seeking additional references or considering alternative legal counsel to ensure their needs are met with professionalism and effective communication.