Solock Michael A

Welcome to Nearby Lawyers, your platform for finding legal professionals in your local area. Today, we are providing information about Solock Michael A, a lawyer with an office located at 4619 N Ravenswood Ave, Chicago, IL 60640, USA. If you are searching for legal representation in Chicago, it's important to consider all available information to make an informed decision.

While we aim to provide a comprehensive overview, our introduction today relies significantly on the publicly available feedback regarding Solock Michael A. It's crucial to note that this information comes from a single online review and may not represent the experiences of all clients. However, in the spirit of providing an objective introduction based on the information available, we will detail the content of this review.

According to one client's account, their experience with Solock Michael A, beginning in the second week of May 2022, involved representation in a protection order case. The client expressed significant dissatisfaction with the services received. The review states, "From the beginning I got nothing but judgement and inefficient counsel from him." This is a strong statement and suggests a negative initial impression.

The client further alleges issues with communication, stating that Mr. Solock would "often ghost me," failing to return calls or answer texts despite multiple attempts. Effective communication is a cornerstone of a positive attorney-client relationship, and this feedback raises concerns in this area.

The review also details a specific situation regarding the client's belongings in an apartment they were required to vacate. The client claims to have had over $200,000 worth of possessions in the apartment, compared to their ex's reportedly minimal belongings. The client wanted to move their belongings out due to a text message indicating the ex's intent to sell or destroy them. According to the review, Mr. Solock allegedly did not file a motion to remove the belongings and purportedly advised the client that they would likely only be given a very limited time to retrieve items from the 1,200 square foot apartment.

The client recounts being given approximately 25 minutes by the police to remove their belongings during the single opportunity they had, resulting in their ability to only retrieve essential items like clothes and medication, potentially leading to the loss of other significant possessions, including their daughter's baby pictures. This paints a picture of a stressful and unsatisfactory outcome for the client regarding their personal property.

Furthermore, the review claims that during the initial hearing, the client's ex allegedly admitted that her primary concern was not safety, which was the basis of the protection order, but rather when she would have to move. The client alleges that Mr. Solock "ignored what she said and didn't address the statement to the judge," suggesting a missed opportunity to potentially resolve the case earlier. The client believes the entire situation, which they were still dealing with at the time of the review, could have been resolved much sooner if Mr. Solock had acted differently.

The timeline of the case, as described in the review, also raises concerns. The client states that instead of a potential dismissal based on the ex's statement and evidence provided to Mr. Solock almost two weeks before the hearing, the hearing was postponed by five weeks. The client further claims that Mr. Solock requested an additional week's delay due to his unavailability. During this period, the client reports incurring the expense of renting hotel rooms, which they could not afford, allegedly exacerbated by Mr. Solock's continued lack of communication.

The client also mentions a canceled appointment with Mr. Solock a week before a court date. Ultimately, the client decided to terminate Mr. Solock's services but still required crucial information for their upcoming court appearance. The review alleges that Mr. Solock "refused to provide it to me and instead got very petty," leading the client to take a $50 Uber to the courthouse to obtain the necessary information. The client claims Mr. Solock finally sent the information an hour before the court hearing, by which time they were already at the courthouse.

The concluding remarks of the review are highly critical, with the client stating, "Now because Michael didn't do his job I have to wait until late December to finally tell my side of the story, something that could have ended in three weeks has now turned into eight months. Michael is very egger to take your cash but very lazy afterwards!!" The client also indicates an intention to report Mr. Solock to the Bar Association and the Better Business Bureau.

Given this publicly available review, individuals considering legal services from Solock Michael A should be aware of this feedback. While this is just one person's experience, it highlights potential concerns regarding communication, efficiency, and client service. As part of your due diligence in choosing a lawyer from our "Nearby Lawyers" category, we encourage you to consider all available information, including reviews and any other publicly accessible details, and to potentially seek additional perspectives or conduct further research. You may want to consider contacting other attorneys in the area to compare services and find the representation that best suits your needs.

This introduction aims to provide an objective summary of the publicly available information regarding Solock Michael A. We encourage users to conduct their own thorough research and consider multiple sources of information when making decisions about legal representation. If you are looking for alternative options within our "Nearby Lawyers" platform, please feel free to browse other listings.