SKLAR LAW, LLC

For individuals and entities seeking legal services in Cherry Hill Township, NJ, SKLAR LAW, LLC is a firm operating within the "Nearby Lawyers" platform category. While the firm's specific areas of practice are not exhaustively detailed in the provided information, client reviews offer a glimpse into the types of cases they handle and, significantly, highlight critical aspects of their client communication and service delivery.

SKLAR LAW, LLC is located at 20 Brace Rd, Cherry Hill Township, NJ 08034, USA. This address places the firm in a well-known commercial area of Cherry Hill, a prominent and accessible township in South Jersey. The location on Brace Road suggests an office within a professional or commercial complex. Typically, a law firm's office is designed to provide a professional and confidential setting for client meetings and legal work. While specific details about the interior aesthetics or accessibility features are not provided, clients would generally expect a discreet environment suitable for discussing sensitive legal and financial matters. The firm's presence in Cherry Hill indicates a local focus, serving the legal needs of residents and businesses within the township and surrounding areas.

Based on the provided client reviews, SKLAR LAW, LLC appears to engage in legal matters that involve debt and financial disputes, as well as general client representation where fees are paid for services. Specifically, the reviews suggest that they may handle:

• Debt Collection and Judgment Enforcement: One review explicitly mentions an attorney filing a judgment to garnish wages due to unpaid debt. This indicates that the firm represents creditors in debt recovery actions, including pursuing legal judgments and wage garnishment.
• General Legal Representation and Consultation: The reviews imply that clients engage the firm for legal assistance where fees are paid for services rendered. The reference to "paying in full" for legal representation suggests cases requiring ongoing legal work or consultation.

Given the nature of the complaints, it appears the firm might handle cases where financial agreements and obligations are central, either on behalf of clients seeking to recover funds or representing clients in debt-related disputes. It is important to note that the provided information does not offer a comprehensive list of all practice areas, and potential clients should always inquire directly about the specific services offered and the firm's expertise in their particular legal matter.

The features of SKLAR LAW, LLC, as perceived through the provided client reviews, present a mixed and concerning picture. While the reviews do not offer details about the firm's founding, its partners, or their individual professional backgrounds (beyond mentioning "Marc Stofman" as a lawyer associated with the firm), they heavily emphasize the client experience.

One major feature, as highlighted by negative client feedback, is a perceived lack of consistent and timely communication. A client states that "My so called lawyer Marc Stofman has refused to get back to me in 5 months. I have emailed him and left many voicemails and messages with the secretary." This indicates a significant breakdown in client-attorney communication, which is a fundamental aspect of professional legal service. Another client's distress over not being able to reach their attorney for a considerable period further underscores this concern.

Another critically important feature, from the clients' perspective, is the perceived lack of transparency regarding legal filings and the justification for fees. One client expresses a feeling of having been "stole my money" because they "have never seen a court document to prove they actually filed the charges with the court." This points to a severe issue of trust and accountability, as clients expect clear documentation and justification for legal actions taken on their behalf, especially after paying fees in full.

A distressing feature highlighted is the firm's perceived aggressive stance towards clients, particularly concerning debt collection. A client details how, despite personal hardship and attempts to negotiate payments, the lawyer "started to file a judgement to try to cease my wages" and "threatened me with going to have the judgement to garnish my wages." This suggests a firm that may prioritize collection over client understanding or compassion, even in cases of genuine financial distress and personal hardship. The client's strong sentiment, "he don't care. Maybe as a company you want to hire these people because they’re threatening and awful. But you look just as awful having no human decency," illustrates a severe dissatisfaction with the firm's approach to client care.

While a law firm's professional background typically includes attorney experience, education, and accolades, the provided reviews focus almost entirely on negative aspects of client interaction and service delivery. This makes it challenging to present positive professional features based solely on the given information. The features that emerge are primarily centered on client dissatisfaction with communication, perceived transparency, and client-handling ethics, rather than legal expertise or positive outcomes.

In the context of the "Nearby Lawyers" category, law firms typically promote themselves through positive client testimonials, expertise in specific legal areas, and a commitment to client satisfaction. However, in the case of SKLAR LAW, LLC, the provided reviews serve as critical, albeit highly negative, client insights that would directly impact any promotional efforts.

The first client's review, "Skylar law is nothing but scammers in my opinion. My so called lawyer Marc Stofman has refused to get back to me in 5 months. I have emailed him and left many voicemails and messages with the secretary. They got payed in full. I have never seen a court document to prove they actually filed the charges with the court. I feel the stole my money. Cant believe they are even in business," is a severe accusation. It alleges fraud, a complete breakdown in communication, and a lack of accountability after receiving full payment. This review would deter potential clients and stands in stark contrast to the positive endorsements typically sought for promotional purposes.

The second review is equally damning, detailing a client's desperate struggle with debt compounded by severe personal tragedy. The client describes the lawyer as "honestly not a nice person" and recounts being "threatened me with going to have the judgement to garnish my wages" despite attempts to negotiate payments. The client expresses profound disappointment and anger, stating, "But he don’t care. Maybe as a company you want to hire these people because they’re threatening and awful. But you look just as awful having no human decency." This feedback highlights a significant perceived lack of empathy and a focus on aggressive collection tactics over understanding a client's difficult circumstances.

These reviews, while offering direct insights, do not function as positive promotional information. Instead, they serve as warnings to potential clients, raising serious concerns about the firm's communication practices, transparency, ethical conduct, and client care. For any individual or business considering SKLAR LAW, LLC from the "Nearby Lawyers" platform, these testimonials would be a crucial part of their due diligence, suggesting that a high degree of caution and thorough investigation into the firm's practices and reputation is warranted before engagement. The information provided heavily emphasizes client dissatisfaction, particularly concerning aspects of professional conduct and client interaction, rather than highlighting successful legal outcomes or positive client relationships.