Schrank II Raymond E

For individuals in Greenfield, WI, seeking legal representation, the "Nearby Lawyers" category offers a range of options. When considering legal professionals, it is crucial to review all available information, including direct client experiences, to make an informed decision. Schrank II Raymond E is a legal entity operating in this area, and an objective introduction, based on public reviews, provides insight into their services and client interactions.

The office for Schrank II Raymond E is situated at 4811 S 76th St #200, Greenfield, WI 53220, USA. This address places the firm within a commercial area of Greenfield, suggesting accessibility for local residents. The provided contact information includes a phone number (262) 679-2094 and a mobile phone number +1 262-679-2094, indicating channels for communication. However, the operational environment and client experience are significantly shaped by the interactions and perceived professionalism, as detailed in client feedback.

While specific areas of law practiced by Schrank II Raymond E are not explicitly stated in the provided information, the client reviews offer glimpses into the types of cases they may handle. One review mentions "waivers" and a "petition," which could broadly relate to immigration law, administrative law, or other legal processes requiring specific forms and applications. The nature of the complaints, such as incorrect filings and unfiled petitions, suggests involvement in procedural legal work that directly impacts client outcomes and timelines. The substantial fees mentioned ($10,000+ collected) imply involvement in cases that are either complex or require significant time and effort, or are perceived to be so by the firm.

The features of the service provided by Schrank II Raymond E, as described by the available customer reviews, raise significant concerns related to fundamental aspects of legal representation:

• Communication Issues: Both reviews emphatically highlight a severe lack of communication. Phrases like "stopped answering my calls and emails probably 2 years ago" and "repeatedly had to contact them. Eventually Kristin stopped answering my phone calls and text messages" point to a consistent and prolonged failure to maintain contact with clients. This is a critical deficiency in legal practice, as clients rely on their attorneys for updates, guidance, and reassurance.

• Case Handling and Diligence: One client explicitly states, "They filed incorrectly my waivers and after 2 years of waiting for a response the notice t said that the form they used was not updated and it was rejected because of that." This indicates a potential lack of diligence in ensuring forms are correct and up-to-date, leading to significant delays and adverse impacts on the client's case. Another client claims, "These lawyers didn't file anything for my case no petition never contacted me." Such statements suggest a failure to perform agreed-upon services and a fundamental breakdown in case progression.

• Fee Disputes and Transparency: A severe concern highlighted is the issue of fees. One client states, "After an agreed price they increased it more than 1000. They collected 100% of their fees. I paid more than 10k." The accusation of increasing fees by such a large margin after an initial agreement, while allegedly not providing the promised services, points to significant transparency and ethical concerns regarding billing practices. The claim of having "all transactions and emails they sent me" suggests a documented history of these financial interactions.

• Client Trust and Professionalism: The emotional language used in the reviews, such as "worst experiences I've had," "worst lawyer will take advantage of you," "will lie to you," and "Steal your money and not provide the services you agreed to," reflects a profound erosion of trust and a strong perception of unprofessional conduct. Phrases like "always came with excuses of why things where not being done" further undermine confidence in the firm's integrity and commitment to client outcomes.

Promotional information for Schrank II Raymond E, if available online, would typically focus on expertise, client commitment, and successful outcomes. However, based solely on the provided client testimonials, any objective introduction must convey the significant negative experiences reported. Potential clients searching within the "Nearby Lawyers" category would need to be aware of these documented concerns regarding service delivery, communication, and financial practices. The phone numbers provided, (262) 679-2094 and +1 262-679-2094, serve as points of contact, but clients' stated inability to reach the firm suggests that these contact methods may not always yield effective communication.

The experiences described by these clients stand in stark contrast to the expected standards of legal service, which include diligent case management, transparent communication, and adherence to agreed-upon fee structures. The implication from the reviews is that clients were left feeling abandoned and financially exploited, with their legal matters either stalled or negatively impacted by the firm's alleged inaction and improper handling. The sentiment of having to "pay someone else to actually take care of my case" after paying a substantial sum to Schrank II Raymond E is particularly concerning.

In conclusion, Schrank II Raymond E, located at 4811 S 76th St #200, Greenfield, WI 53220, USA, is a legal professional operating in the "Nearby Lawyers" category. Based on the provided client reviews, there are significant and recurring concerns about their service. These concerns include a profound lack of communication, alleged failures in diligently handling cases (such as incorrect or unfiled paperwork), and highly problematic billing practices, including accusations of drastically increasing fees and not providing agreed-upon services. While the specific legal areas beyond those hinted at by "waivers" and "petitions" are not detailed, the feedback strongly indicates issues with client trust and professional responsibility. For local users in Greenfield considering legal representation from this firm, it is imperative to be aware of these serious allegations and to conduct thorough due diligence, including seeking direct clarification on communication policies, case management procedures, and all aspects of fee agreements, before engaging their services.