Myles Seth

For local users in Brooklyn seeking legal representation under the category "Nearby Lawyers," it is crucial to carefully consider all available information regarding potential attorneys. This page provides an introduction to Myles Seth, an attorney with an office located at 186 Montague St in Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA. However, it is essential to preface this introduction with a significant caveat: the single client review available online paints a highly negative picture of their experience with this attorney. This introduction will objectively present the information available, primarily focusing on the concerns raised in the review, as there are no positive testimonials or other data to provide a balanced perspective.

The environment of Myles Seth's office at 186 Montague Street, while not explicitly described by the reviewer, is likely a standard professional office setting. Montague Street in Brooklyn Heights is a well-known area with numerous legal offices. Clients might expect a typical lawyer's office with consultation rooms and administrative areas. However, the reviewer's negative experience overshadows any potential description of the physical environment, as their concerns primarily relate to the attorney's conduct and handling of their case.

The services that Myles Seth reportedly provided, based on the sole review, fall within the realm of family court. The reviewer explicitly states that Mr. Seth was their "assigned council in family court." This suggests that his practice includes representing individuals in legal matters related to family law, which can encompass a wide range of issues such as divorce, child custody, child support, visitation rights, and other domestic relations cases. As assigned counsel, he was likely appointed by the court to represent the reviewer in a specific family court matter.

The features of Myles Seth's representation, as described by the dissatisfied client, raise significant concerns for potential users:

• Poor Communication: A major complaint is the alleged lack of timely communication. The reviewer states that Mr. Seth "only answers your calls, texts and emails the day of trial." This suggests a pattern of poor responsiveness and difficulty in contacting the attorney outside of immediate court dates.
• Dismissive Attitude: When Mr. Seth did communicate, the reviewer found him to be "pretty dismissive," indicating a lack of engagement with the client's concerns and a potential disregard for their perspective.
• Perceived Prioritization of Other Cases: The reviewer mentions reading other reviews stating that Mr. Seth is "always in trial with cases that are more important than yours." This perception suggests a potential issue with case management and the allocation of attention to individual clients.
• Lack of Seriousness Towards Client Concerns: The reviewer's "biggest complaint is he didn’t take my concerns or case seriously." This is a critical issue, as it implies a failure to adequately understand and address the client's needs and the specifics of their legal situation.
• Alleged Lack of Effort and Focus on Outcome: The reviewer expresses the feeling that Mr. Seth was not genuinely trying to win their case, suggesting a potential lack of diligence or commitment to achieving a favorable outcome for the client. The comment "He gets paid either way" further fuels this concern.
• Avoidance of Evidence: The statement "Evidence is a foreign concept to him to be avoided at all cost" is a serious accusation, implying a potential failure to properly investigate and utilize relevant information in the case.
• Feeling of Self-Representation Being Better: The reviewer felt that they "could have represented myself better than he did," which is a damning indictment of the perceived quality of legal representation provided.
• Weak Cross-Examination: The reviewer found Mr. Seth's cross-examination to be "very weak," suggesting a potential lack of effective courtroom advocacy skills.
• Lack of Consultation Before Closing Arguments: The reviewer criticizes the fact that Mr. Seth apparently did not consult with them before making his closing arguments, indicating a lack of collaboration and client involvement in crucial aspects of the trial.

Given the overwhelmingly negative nature of the single available review, there is no positive promotional information to extract. In fact, the review serves as a strong warning against engaging Mr. Seth's services, at least based on this individual's experience. The lack of any positive feedback or counter-narrative further amplifies the concerns raised.

For local users in Brooklyn seeking a "Nearby Lawyer," particularly for family court matters, the information available regarding Myles Seth at 186 Montague St presents significant red flags. The detailed account of poor communication, dismissive behavior, perceived lack of effort, and ineffective representation should give potential clients serious pause. The reviewer's strong dissatisfaction and feeling of being better off representing themselves are critical points to consider. While this is only one review, in the absence of any positive feedback or other information to provide a balanced perspective, it serves as a crucial piece of data for anyone considering engaging Myles Seth for legal services. It is strongly recommended that individuals seeking legal representation in Brooklyn thoroughly research and consider other attorneys with more positive or a greater number of reviews to ensure they receive competent and dedicated legal counsel. The low rating implied by the reviewer ("less stars but one is the lowest they allow") further underscores the severity of their negative experience.