Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke

Nearby Lawyers Virginia Fairfax Fairfax Boulevard

11150 Fairfax Blvd #400, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
+1 703-913-9000

Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke Introduce

Welcome to our platform for Nearby Lawyers. If you are a local user in Fairfax, Virginia, seeking legal representation, you might be considering the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke, located at 11150 Fairfax Blvd #400, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. You can reach their office at (703) 913-9000 or their mobile number, which is also +1 703-913-9000. It is always advisable to contact the law office directly to discuss your specific legal needs and to obtain the most current information about their services and areas of practice.

Environment and Atmosphere

The Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke is situated in a professional building at 11150 Fairfax Blvd #400 in Fairfax, Virginia. While specific details about the office environment are not available online, one can generally expect a setting conducive to legal consultations and work. Professional office spaces typically aim to provide a confidential and organized atmosphere for client meetings and legal proceedings. The location in Fairfax Blvd suggests accessibility for clients in the Fairfax and surrounding areas.

Legal Services Offered

Information readily available online does not specify the exact areas of law in which the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke primarily practices. However, the inclusion of a customer review detailing a dental malpractice case suggests that the office may handle personal injury or professional malpractice claims. To understand the full scope of their legal services, including whether they handle other areas such as family law, estate planning, business law, or criminal defense, it is crucial to contact the office directly.

Features and Considerations

One piece of information available is a detailed customer review. It is important to consider that this review represents a single individual's experience and may not be representative of all clients' experiences with the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke. The review raises significant concerns regarding the handling of a specific dental malpractice case. According to the review, the client alleges several issues, including:

Failure to include all relevant treatment information in the complaint.
Alleged mishandling of fraudulent dental records provided by the defendant.
Claims of delayed deposition of the defendant without apparent reason.
Alleged failure to subpoena crucial records and question the defendant specifically on key issues.
Concerns about the handling of potential evidence concealment by an associated oral surgeon.
Alleged failure to depose key witnesses with "material" information.
Claims of not incorporating false treatment information throughout the defendant's revised notes and comparing them with the client's records.
Alleged inaccuracies regarding the total fees paid by the client.
Claims of not addressing alleged lies by the defendant regarding lab prescriptions and dental impressions.
Alleged failure to shift the burden of proof regarding lab receipts to the dentist.
Concerns about not specifically addressing issues raised by the client's dental expert, such as lack of x-rays, informed consent, and treatment plans.
Claims of ignoring the client's testimony and emails and rushing the expert's testimony designation.
Alleged dismissal of a significant portion of the client's treatments and disagreement with the dental expert's assessments.
Claims of not reviewing records and deposition with the client and limiting their input into the lawsuit.
Concerns about the deposition of the dentist's hygienist while allegedly neglecting the client's witnesses.
Allegations of releasing confidential information without prior review with the client.
Claims of inappropriately adding the client's husband to interrogatories, allegedly causing additional emotional distress.

It is essential to approach this review objectively as one person's account. Legal cases can be complex, and outcomes can be influenced by various factors. However, the detailed nature of the review warrants careful consideration for potential clients. It highlights the importance of clear communication, thorough investigation, and diligent representation in legal matters, particularly in complex cases like medical malpractice.

Promotional Information and Call to Action

For local users in Fairfax, Virginia, who are seeking legal representation, the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke is an option to consider. Located conveniently in Fairfax, they can be reached at (703) 913-9000 to discuss your legal needs. If you are facing a potential legal issue, it is recommended that you contact their office to inquire about their specific areas of practice and to schedule a consultation to discuss the details of your case.

When considering legal representation, it is always prudent to have a thorough discussion about your case, the attorney's experience in the relevant area of law, the firm's processes for communication and case management, and any potential concerns you may have. Engaging in a direct consultation will allow you to assess whether the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke is the right fit for your legal needs.

While a detailed positive promotional narrative cannot be constructed based solely on the provided information, including the critical customer review, it is important for potential clients to conduct their own due diligence. This may involve contacting the office, inquiring about their expertise in your specific legal area, and potentially seeking additional references or information to form a comprehensive understanding of their services and client satisfaction.

If you require legal assistance in Fairfax, VA, take the initiative to contact the Law Office of Kathleen G. Burke at 11150 Fairfax Blvd #400, or call them at (703) 913-9000 to learn more about how they may be able to assist you with your legal matters. Remember to ask specific questions related to your situation and to discuss their approach to client communication and case handling.

Location

Customer Reviews

(1 reviews)

p collins

Dec 02, 2015

Ms. Burke filed a 2 Million $$ Dental malpractice on my behalf for tx beg 4-30-2003 thru 2-9-12, however, I reminded her that the complaint did not include all of my txs & referred her to the orig copy of DEF's website provided on 5-25-12, which noted a false YR[2003] as to when the DEF's practice 1st opened, includg our bank rxds showing cks written to DEF on 7-25-2002 & 8-28-2002. In May 2013, I presented copies of my prior records to Ms. Burke that showed DEF deliberately w/h 1st 3 tx's for litigation purposes & fraudulntly postd these tx's (8-28-02,9-18-02, 10-2-02) to a new dental chart & slippd the chart into my formr dentist's rxds. DEF also posted husband's 1st tx w/him on 7-25-2002 to that chart & noted recent diabetes diagnosis.. Ms. Burke had the fraudulent rxds 11 mos prior to DEF's depo, & was ethically reqd to addrs & modify my complnt by mid-May 2014 due to statutes (VA Reg. 18.2-260.1); however, DEF's deposition w/out reason was delayed 6 mos which still gave ample time to subpoenaed the record, but she ignored my emails requesting a doc examiner, and never specifically questioned DEF. Thus, DEF was allowed to w/h my 1st 3 tx's & present False interogs. In Sept 2013, I also informd Ms. Burke that the Oral Surgeon assoc w/Def appeared to be concealing evidence, since he failed to provide her w/copy of my 1st consult for Implants in July 2007 & though she pick/up the phone as she was calling someone & assuring me they wud f/up, no report rec'd (nor did surgeon note her recontact when I f/up'd in 10-14. She also failed to depose my witnesses(2 formr employees w/info "material" to my case), she failed to add the false tx info thru-out the DEF's re-written tx notes & compare the notes w/ all of my dental recepts & calendars that I provided, which documented my 30+ emerg visits. She failed to add his false allegs that my total fees wer approx. $43,000 since my receipts& bank records clearly shwd m/than $60,000, she failed to add the DEF's lies regarding his lab prescripts receipts & dental impress (as advised by a frmr employee who was never deposed), & she failed to get copy of flood receipt. She also failed to shift burden to dentist re: lab receipts, failed to specifically address the specific egregious problems identified by my exemplary Dental Expert, Board-Certified Prosthodontist, e.g., no x-rays, no informd consent, no tx plan, etc, She also ignored my entire testimony & emails & they rushed to relese the designation of expert's testimony & egregiously dismissed 1/2 my txs & found defendant fell below the standard of care on one(of many)false tx dates inserted in his notes (1-30-2006);however, my dental expert completely disagreed with these assessments. She failed to review my records & deposition w/me, & essentially dismissed me frm havng input into my lawsuit Ms. Burke also oddly deposed the dentist's "loyal" hygienist who never txd me (but not my witnesses) & repeatdly questiond her re "dry mouth"& meds? Hygienist also testifd that the formr receptionist wud know whether any rxds were dmged by office flood(who ws my witness but nevr deposed).She releasd confide info that shud hav been reviewd w/me prior to it's releas(especially since she promisd in an earlier email [May 2013]that she wud do just that) & includng fact that on 1 specific date it reflects a typo that ws clearly in error & shud hav been immediatly brought to my atten as well as my physicians for correction as subsequently notified to her co-counsel. Moreover, she also relsed info that was confidential re: marriage counselng accomplished by adding husband to interrogs unknowingly at the time for the sole purpose to further humiliate me (despite my earlier email to her on May 2013.).Thus, despite suffering with sx's of PTSD, Major Depression and overall deteriorating well-being for nearly 10 years due to the total destruction of my oral health, which prevented me from actually chewing my foods and engaging in social functions, Ms. Burke & co-counsel outrageously added add'l emotional distress & I was essentially duped again.