Law Office of Gary D. Fielder

Within the "Nearby Lawyers" platform category, we introduce the Law Office of Gary D. Fielder, a legal practice located at 2325 W 72nd Ave, Denver, CO 80221, USA. While their physical office is in Colorado, the contrasting feedback from clients regarding their services may be relevant for individuals seeking legal assistance, even if you are currently located in Japan and considering legal options in the United States. It is crucial to carefully consider all available information, both positive and negative, when evaluating legal representation, as experiences can vary significantly. Direct legal engagement with the Law Office of Gary D. Fielder would typically be for legal matters within their licensed jurisdiction, likely Colorado, unless they have specific expertise or affiliations extending beyond this.

The Law Office of Gary D. Fielder can be contacted by phone at (303) 650-1505 or via their mobile number +1 303-650-1505. These contact details provide a direct way to reach their office for inquiries or to schedule a consultation. Although the provided information does not detail their office environment, law offices typically aim to provide a setting conducive to discussing legal matters with privacy and professionalism.

The testimonials from clients present a divided view of the services provided by the Law Office of Gary D. Fielder. Several clients offer strong positive feedback, while one client expresses significant dissatisfaction. It is important to consider both perspectives to form a balanced understanding.

One client highly recommends Gary, emphasizing his exceptional responsiveness. They note that he is one of the few lawyers who readily answers his phone and consistently returns calls promptly, instilling confidence in his communication. This client also praises Gary's personable approach and positive attitude, which they found particularly helpful during a stressful time. Furthermore, they highlight his skills, knowledge, and connections as crucial factors in achieving their desired outcome.

Another client shares a remarkable experience where, upon hiring Gary, the District Attorney (DA) was unwilling to proceed to trial. This, the client believes, "speaks volumes about his reputation and effectiveness." This suggests that Gary D. Fielder may have a strong standing within the legal community, potentially leading to favorable outcomes for his clients even before trial.

A third positive review comes from someone who identifies as having been involved in the legal system for years and having dealt with numerous lawyers. This client states that Gary "truly stands out" due to his transparency and integrity. They strongly recommend Gary for those seeking a lawyer who genuinely cares and delivers results, expressing personal gratitude for his services.

However, a starkly contrasting review labels Gary as the "worst attorney" and strongly advises others to avoid him. This client alleges that he is uncommunicative, unreliable, and self-serving, suggesting that representing oneself might be a better option. The review further claims that Gary prioritizes money over clients and misled the client's spouse into believing they could win a case, only to lose at trial. This negative feedback raises serious concerns about communication, reliability, client care, and case management.

Given these conflicting accounts, it is challenging to definitively identify the consistent features of the Law Office of Gary D. Fielder. However, based on the positive reviews, potential features could include:

• High Responsiveness: Promptly answering phone calls and returning messages.
• Personable Approach and Positive Attitude: Creating a more comfortable and less stressful client experience.
• Strong Legal Skills and Knowledge: Possessing the necessary expertise to achieve favorable results.
• Valuable Connections: Leveraging professional relationships to benefit clients.
• Strong Reputation: Having a standing within the legal community that may influence case outcomes.
• Transparency and Integrity: Operating with honesty and openness with clients.
• Genuine Care for Clients (according to some): Prioritizing client well-being and working towards positive results.

Conversely, the negative review suggests potential issues with:

• Lack of Communication: Failing to keep clients informed or respond to inquiries.
• Unreliability: Not consistently meeting expectations or fulfilling obligations.
• Self-Serving Behavior: Prioritizing personal gain over client interests.
• Misleading Clients: Creating unrealistic expectations about case outcomes.
• Focus on Money: Allegedly prioritizing fees over effective representation.

In terms of promotional information, the positive testimonials serve as strong endorsements, highlighting responsiveness, effectiveness, and integrity. The instance where the DA was reportedly unwilling to go to trial against Gary could also be seen as a powerful, albeit indirect, form of promotion, suggesting a formidable legal presence. However, the severe negative review significantly counteracts these positive aspects and should not be ignored.

For local users in Japan accessing the "Nearby Lawyers" platform, it is crucial to weigh all available feedback when considering legal representation in the United States. The Law Office of Gary D. Fielder has received both high praise and strong criticism. If you have legal matters within the jurisdiction where this office operates (likely Colorado), you may want to consider the specific aspects of your case and how the reported strengths and weaknesses of this attorney might align with your needs. Responsiveness and a strong reputation could be beneficial, but concerns about communication and reliability should also be carefully evaluated. It might be prudent to seek additional information or consider other legal options to ensure you find representation that best suits your specific circumstances.

In conclusion, the Law Office of Gary D. Fielder in Denver, Colorado, presents a complex picture based on the available client reviews. While some clients praise his responsiveness, effectiveness, personable approach, and integrity, another client expresses significant dissatisfaction with his communication, reliability, and client care. Potential clients should carefully consider this contrasting feedback and conduct further due diligence, such as seeking additional references or consultations, to determine if this law office aligns with their specific legal needs and expectations. The information provided does not allow for a definitive recommendation without acknowledging the serious concerns raised in one of the reviews.