King Hammond Law Center Inc.

Welcome to the local profile of King Hammond Law Center Inc., situated at 2100 Parklake Dr NE, Atlanta, GA 30345, USA. As a member of the "Nearby Lawyers" category, this law firm aims to provide legal services to the residents and businesses of Atlanta and the surrounding metropolitan area. Led by Attorney King-Hammond, the firm has received contrasting feedback from clients, with one praising their long-term dedication and another expressing extreme dissatisfaction with their services, particularly in an immigration-related matter.

The office of King Hammond Law Center Inc. is located on Parklake Drive NE in Atlanta, within a commercial or office building setting. This location offers accessibility for clients in the area. However, the provided reviews do not offer any specific details about the ambiance or features of the physical office environment. The focus of the feedback is centered on the quality of legal representation and client communication.

The available client reviews present a dichotomy of experiences with King Hammond Law Center Inc. One long-term client offers high praise for Attorney King-Hammond, describing her as "professional, caring, and dedicated." This client states that Attorney King-Hammond has represented them for over 15 years, highlighting her consistency, perseverance, and consistent availability throughout this extended period. The reviewer emphasizes that Attorney King-Hammond "doesn't give up" and has always been present and responsive, never failing to follow through. They consider her an "amazing attorney with a lot of experience" and would choose her again, expressing gratitude for her work and the respectful and caring treatment of their family.

In stark contrast, another client reports a "worst business experience" with King Hammond Law Center Inc. This reviewer paid a significant amount of money for the firm's services to retrieve a naturalization form. According to their account, the case has been ongoing for three years without resolution or any "relieving updates or details." The client describes a frustrating pattern of calling the office and being told they would receive a callback by the end of the day, which allegedly never occurs. They also state that they have been unable to speak with Mrs. Hammond directly, consistently being told she is unavailable. The reviewer conveys a strong impression of a lack of urgency from the firm in resolving their case or providing reassurance during the prolonged process. They also mention that the firm initially provided a one-year timeframe for the service, which has now been exceeded by two years. The client concludes by stating that they paid for a service they have not received and issues a warning to potential clients to "Beware!"

Based on these contrasting client experiences, the key aspects to consider regarding King Hammond Law Center Inc. include:

• Positive Long-Term Representation (as per one review): Attorney King-Hammond is described as professional, caring, dedicated, consistent, and persistent over a 15-year period, with a strong commitment to her clients.
• Significant Issues with Case Resolution and Communication (as per one review): Another client reports a three-year delay in resolving a naturalization form retrieval, a lack of updates, unreturned calls, and inability to speak with Mrs. Hammond, indicating potential issues with efficiency and client communication in certain cases.
• Potential Specialization (Implied): The mention of a naturalization form retrieval suggests that the firm may handle immigration-related legal services, although this is not explicitly stated.
• Inconsistent Client Experiences: The drastically different reviews highlight a potential inconsistency in the quality of service or the handling of different types of cases within the firm.
• Lack of Promotional Information: The provided text does not include any specific promotional offers or details about the firm's broader range of services.

Given the significant discrepancy in client experiences, local users considering King Hammond Law Center Inc. for their legal needs should carefully weigh these perspectives. The positive review speaks to the potential for dedicated and long-term representation, while the negative review raises serious concerns about the firm's ability to deliver results in a timely manner and maintain effective communication with clients, at least in some instances.

For individuals seeking legal assistance, particularly in immigration matters such as naturalization, the negative review detailing a prolonged and unresolved case with poor communication should be a significant point of consideration. It would be prudent to inquire specifically about the firm's processes for handling such cases, their communication protocols, and to seek additional reviews or references to gain a more comprehensive understanding of their service quality in this area.

Conversely, the positive long-term review suggests that Attorney King-Hammond may excel in other areas of law or with clients who require sustained representation over many years. Without further information on the firm's specific practice areas, it is challenging to determine the full scope of their services and where their strengths truly lie.

Local users in Atlanta considering King Hammond Law Center Inc. should conduct thorough due diligence. This could include seeking additional reviews from various online platforms, contacting the firm directly to inquire about their specific services and processes, and potentially seeking consultations with other law firms to compare their approaches and expertise. The contrasting feedback highlights the importance of gathering a comprehensive understanding before making a decision.

In conclusion, King Hammond Law Center Inc. in Atlanta, GA, presents a complex picture based on the limited client feedback available. While one client praises Attorney King-Hammond's long-term dedication and professionalism, another reports a severely negative experience with unresolved issues and poor communication in an immigration matter. Potential clients should be aware of these differing perspectives and conduct further research to determine if the firm aligns with their specific legal needs and expectations regarding service and communication.