Jones Law Firm PC

For individuals in Aurora, Colorado, and the surrounding areas seeking legal representation, Jones Law Firm PC, situated at 14202 E Evans Ave, Aurora, CO 80014, USA, is listed under the "Nearby Lawyers" category. This law firm aims to provide legal services to the local community. Potential clients can contact the firm at (303) 900-4096 or +1 303-900-4096 to inquire about their legal needs.

The physical environment of Jones Law Firm PC, located on East Evans Avenue in Aurora, suggests a professional office setting within a commercial area. This location likely offers accessibility for clients in the eastern part of the Denver metropolitan area. The presence of a physical address indicates a local establishment providing in-person legal consultations and services.

Based on the available online reviews, client experiences with Jones Law Firm PC appear to be significantly divergent. One client offers high praise for an attorney named Maggie, describing her as "the best." This reviewer highlighted Maggie's professionalism, knowledge, and proactive approach, stating that she guided them through their case step by step. The client felt Maggie deserved more than a 5-star rating and highly recommended her services.

In stark contrast, another reviewer expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the firm. This client raised serious concerns regarding the firm's communication, billing practices, and handling of their case. They alleged that the firm did not respond to direct questions about the case and available actions. A specific accusation was made regarding a charge nearly four times the standard court filing fee, which the reviewer deemed unethical. Furthermore, the client claimed to have specifically requested the inclusion of certain evidence in a motion, which they were allegedly told was unnecessary, ultimately leading to the motion's denial due to the absence of that exact documentation.

The negative review also criticized an individual named Patrick Barkman for being condescending and misspelling the client's name. The firm's billing practices were questioned concerning weekly meetings with a paralegal to strategize next steps, for which the client was charged. When notes from these sessions were requested, the firm allegedly became unresponsive. Similarly, after the motion was denied, the client reported a delay in discussing next steps, despite being billed for ongoing case reviews. The reviewer further claimed that the firm lost a payment exceeding $3,000 and threatened to withdraw from the case. Attempts to contact the billing department and a specific individual named Sara Thorp were reportedly unsuccessful. Overall, this reviewer characterized the firm's practices as unethical, their communication as nonexistent or evasive, and strongly advised against trusting them.

The services offered by Jones Law Firm PC are not explicitly detailed in the provided information. However, based on the nature of legal practices and the context of the reviews (a "case," a "motion," "court filing fee"), it can be inferred that the firm handles litigation and other legal proceedings. The positive review suggests expertise in guiding clients through legal processes in a knowledgeable and professional manner. The negative review, while critical, also points to the firm's involvement in court filings and motion preparation, albeit with allegations of mishandling.

Key features of Jones Law Firm PC, as perceived through the lens of the reviews, present a mixed picture. On one hand, the positive feedback highlights professionalism, knowledge, proactivity, and effective guidance from an attorney named Maggie. This suggests that at least some members of the firm are capable of providing excellent legal service. On the other hand, the negative review raises serious concerns about communication, billing transparency, organizational issues (losing a significant payment), and the conduct of at least one individual within the firm (Patrick Barkman). The discrepancy between these two accounts underscores the importance for potential clients to consider both perspectives.

The environment of Jones Law Firm PC, as perceived through the limited information, is difficult to definitively assess. The positive review suggests a supportive and professional atmosphere when working with Maggie. However, the negative review paints a picture of poor communication, potential financial mismanagement, and a lack of respect for clients. This stark contrast indicates that client experiences may vary significantly depending on the specific attorney or staff member they interact with and the nature of their case.

In terms of promotional information, the positive review serves as a strong endorsement for Maggie's services within the firm. Her described attributes of professionalism, knowledge, and proactivity could attract clients seeking those qualities in a lawyer. The negative review, however, acts as a significant deterrent, raising red flags about the firm's overall practices and client care. Therefore, any potential promotional value from the positive feedback is heavily overshadowed by the serious allegations in the negative review.

For local users in Aurora seeking a "Nearby Lawyer," Jones Law Firm PC presents a complex profile based on the available reviews. While one client had a highly positive experience with Maggie, another reported severe issues with communication, billing, and case handling. Potential clients should carefully consider these contrasting experiences and conduct further due diligence, such as seeking additional reviews or requesting detailed information about the attorneys and their areas of expertise within the firm. Contacting Jones Law Firm PC at (303) 900-4096 or +1 303-900-4096 may provide an opportunity to ask specific questions and gain a better understanding of their services and client approach. However, the significant concerns raised in one of the reviews warrant thorough investigation before making a decision on legal representation.