Christopher M Howard ESQ

Welcome to the profile of Christopher M Howard ESQ, a legal practice located at 312 N Ave E in Cranford, New Jersey. As a listing in the 'Nearby Lawyers' category, Christopher M Howard ESQ offers legal services to the local community. The available client reviews present a mixed perspective on the firm's services, with one review expressing significant dissatisfaction and raising serious concerns, while another highlights positive experiences in a specific area of law.

Information regarding the specific environment of Christopher M Howard ESQ's office is not detailed in the provided text. However, it is typical for law firms to maintain a professional office setting conducive to client meetings and confidential discussions. You can likely expect a reception area for initial contact and private consultation rooms where Attorney Howard can meet with clients to discuss their legal matters. The overall ambiance would generally aim to convey professionalism and facilitate effective communication.

The client reviews offer contrasting insights into the services provided by Christopher M Howard ESQ:

• Divorce Proceedings: One client reported a negative experience during their divorce proceedings. This review raises serious allegations concerning the attorney's conduct, including a claim of lacking integrity and trustworthiness. The client described an interaction in front of a judge where the attorney allegedly discouraged them from expressing dissatisfaction with his representation, suggesting it would delay the divorce. This review implies potential issues with client communication, ethical conduct, and the attorney's commitment to the client's best interests in divorce cases.
• Real Estate Transactions: In contrast, another client reported a positive experience with Christopher Howard's assistance in purchasing a property. This reviewer found his services to be "incredibly helpful" and offered a definite recommendation for others involved in similar legal obligations related to property acquisition. This suggests competence and a positive client experience in the area of real estate law.

The features of Christopher M Howard ESQ's practice, as perceived through the lens of the client reviews, present a dichotomy:

• Alleged Lack of Integrity and Trustworthiness: The negative review directly accuses the attorney of lacking these fundamental values. The specific incident described, if accurate, raises significant concerns about the attorney's ethical behavior and his interaction with both the client and the court.
• Helpful in Real Estate Transactions: The positive review, however, highlights the attorney's helpfulness in navigating the legal obligations associated with purchasing property. This suggests a level of competence and positive client service in this specific area of law.
• Potential Communication Issues: The negative review implies a lack of open and honest communication, where the client felt discouraged from expressing concerns. Effective communication is a cornerstone of a positive attorney-client relationship, and the allegations suggest a potential breakdown in this area in at least one instance.
• Positive Experience in Property Law: The positive review indicates that clients involved in real estate transactions may have a different, more satisfactory experience with Christopher Howard and his team.

Given the starkly contrasting nature of the two available reviews, it is challenging to form a definitive overall assessment of Christopher M Howard ESQ. The negative review raises serious ethical and professional concerns that potential clients should carefully consider. The positive review, on the other hand, suggests satisfactory service in at least one specific area of law. It is important for local users to weigh both perspectives and potentially seek additional information or references before making a decision.

Currently, no specific promotional information or special offers are mentioned in the provided reviews. Individuals considering engaging the services of Christopher M Howard ESQ are strongly encouraged to conduct thorough due diligence. This could include seeking additional reviews from other sources, checking the attorney's standing with the relevant bar association, and scheduling an initial consultation to discuss their specific legal needs and concerns directly with the attorney. During such a consultation, potential clients can inquire about the attorney's experience in their specific area of need and assess their comfort level with the attorney's communication style and professional approach.

In conclusion, Christopher M Howard ESQ in Cranford, NJ, presents a complex profile based on the limited available client reviews. While one client reported a positive experience with real estate legal obligations, another client raised serious allegations regarding the attorney's integrity and conduct during divorce proceedings. Local users in the 'Nearby Lawyers' category should approach this profile with caution and consider the significant concerns raised in one of the reviews. Thorough research and a direct consultation are strongly recommended to assess whether this legal practice aligns with their individual needs and expectations. The contrasting experiences highlight the importance of considering all available feedback and conducting personal due diligence when selecting legal representation.