Bill Montecucco

Nearby Lawyers Washington Clark County Vancouver Arnada Broadway Street

1914 Broadway St, Vancouver, WA 98663, USA
+1 360-735-8555
webSite

Open Hours:

Monday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Tuesday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Wednesday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Thursday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Saturday, Closed
Sunday, Closed

Bill Montecucco Introduce

Welcome to the platform for Nearby Lawyers, your local resource for connecting with legal professionals in your community. This page provides information about Bill Montecucco, an attorney with an office located in Vancouver, Washington. If you are a local user seeking legal assistance, understanding the location and considering feedback from previous clients can be an important part of your decision-making process.

Bill Montecucco's office is situated at 1914 Broadway St, Vancouver, WA 98663, USA. This address places his practice within the city of Vancouver, suggesting accessibility for residents and businesses in the surrounding areas of Clark County, Washington. Broadway Street is a significant thoroughfare in Vancouver, indicating a potentially central and easily reachable location for clients.

For those interested in contacting Bill Montecucco, the provided phone numbers are (360) 735-8555 (office) and +1 360-735-8555 (mobile). The availability of both a landline and a mobile phone number offers convenience for potential clients seeking to get in touch with his office for inquiries or to discuss their legal needs.

As a platform for Nearby Lawyers, we strive to present an objective view of the legal professionals in your area. The provided information includes a review from a client who worked with Angela at what they refer to as "Belmont tachuca's office." This review expresses high satisfaction with Angela's services, describing her as "super amazing" and effective at achieving results in multiple matters that other attorneys might not handle. The client praises her speed and efficiency. However, it is important to note that this positive review specifically mentions Angela and the "Belmont tachuca's office," and it is not directly about Bill Montecucco himself.

In contrast, another review provides a detailed and critical account of a client's experience with Bill Montecucco. This review pertains to a gross misdemeanor reckless driving charge. The client expresses deep regret about having Bill Montecucco as their representative. The reviewer describes the case as "weak" and mentions a perceived strategy by the local prosecutor and sheriff to delay charges until near the statute of limitations. The client initially believed they had a strong chance of prevailing in court, maintaining their innocence.

The critical review alleges that Bill Montecucco charged significant fees for various aspects of the case. The client states that as they continued to assert their innocence and pointed out alleged inconsistencies in the evidence and testimony, Bill Montecucco became dismissive. This led to a lack of confidence in going to court and significant duress for the client. Eventually, Bill Montecucco presented a diversion offer, which the client accepted on his advice, with the stipulation that they would not admit guilt. The client mentions that another attorney had explained things better prior to this decision.

On the day of entering diversion, the client notes that Bill Montecucco informed them that he had suffered a stroke during the month of negotiating the diversion and mentioned being a guest or visiting judge in traffic court. The client expressed concern upon hearing about the stroke. Subsequently, the client researched similar cases and found instances of delayed charges. They also found a public statement from the Clark County Prosecutor describing diversion as a program for first-time offenders to admit guilt for charge dismissal, which conflicted with the client's non-guilty plea.

A significant point of concern for this reviewer was Bill Montecucco's alleged indifference towards law enforcement dishonesty. The client felt that Bill did not adequately defend them against what they perceived as an overzealous and deceitful prosecutor. The reviewer also questions whether Bill Montecucco's part-time role as a judge might influence his interactions with clients and expresses concern about potential cognitive impairment due to the reported stroke, citing erratic behavior.

The critical review concludes with a heavy-hearted tone, suggesting that Bill Montecucco might be more suitable for clients who acknowledge their guilt and are seeking a plea deal. The reviewer emphasizes the personal and financial cost they experienced due to Bill Montecucco's representation.

Given these contrasting pieces of feedback – a positive review for someone else at a potentially related office and a highly critical review specifically about Bill Montecucco – local users seeking legal representation should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence. The negative review raises serious concerns about communication, client advocacy, handling of specific types of cases (in this instance, a criminal misdemeanor), and overall professionalism.

When considering Bill Montecucco as a potential lawyer from our "Nearby Lawyers" category, it is crucial for local users to weigh the information presented. The positive mention of Angela at a similar office does not directly speak to Bill Montecucco's services. The detailed negative review, however, provides specific allegations and experiences that potential clients should carefully consider. It is recommended that individuals considering Bill Montecucco for legal representation seek additional information, such as direct consultations, and possibly explore other reviews or professional profiles if available online.

As a platform, we aim to provide access to information that can help you make informed decisions. The feedback regarding Bill Montecucco is mixed, with one positive comment about an associate and a significant negative experience detailed by a former client. This highlights the importance of individual research and direct communication with any potential lawyer to determine if they are the right fit for your specific legal needs.

In conclusion, Bill Montecucco is a lawyer located in Vancouver, Washington. While there is a positive review for someone at what might be a related office, a detailed negative review raises concerns about his representation in a criminal misdemeanor case. Local users seeking legal services from Bill Montecucco should carefully consider this feedback and conduct thorough research, including seeking direct consultation, to determine if his services align with their needs and expectations.

Location

Customer Reviews

(28 reviews)

Charlie Nehs

May 05, 2025

I've worked with Angela at Belmont tachuca's office and she is super amazing. She gets results I've had her take care of a couple different things for me and they're quick efficient and they'll take care of what other attorneys won't" waste their time with"

Larry Kellogg

Jan 10, 2025

I deeply regret having Bill Montecucco represent me in a gross misdemeanor reckless driving charge. It was a "weak case" where the Clark county Prosecutor and Clark County Sheriff would wait until just a few days before expiration of statute of limitations. I found they have done this a number of times - I call it the "Diversion Pipeline". In this situation, evidence disappears, memories fade. Bill initially thought we would have a very good chance of prevailing in court. I did not do what I was accused of. Bill charges a lot of money for every little thing. This case was complex and required much work to prepare. Bill changed, I would call him and tell him the Sheriff's were lying, as was the person who filed the report against me - that I just did not do this. To this Bill became dismissive. It was very difficult to deal with him, and as such, I had little confidence in going to court - I suffered a lot of duress. Bill called me with an offer for diversion Things had been so bad, I had gone to another attorney who explained things better. I did stipulate that in no way would I admit guilt. Bill presented diversion as a better outcome than even a not guilty verdict. I accepted diversion on his advice. On the day of entering diversion, Bill was good enough, but upon leaving the courtroom, he told me he had a stroke during the month he was negotiating the diversion. He also told me he was something like a guest judge, or visiting judge , in the traffic court. Something like that. Upon hearing of his stroke, I thought "Great, what else can go wrong?" Later, I did a download of how the cases are tried like mine, waiting so long to charge. There were a number. I also found a video clip on local community television where Clark County Prosecutor, Tony Golik, describes in some time like May, 2012, that diversion is a program for first time offenders to admit their guilt and have their charges dismissed. Mind you, my not guilty plea never changed. My big problem with Bill is that he is wishy-washy on law enforcement corruption. He states he doesn't care about law enforcement dishonesty. I found the deputy prosecutor in this case, Kai Nuce, to be something like a Gestapo punk. It all boils down that when I needed an attorney who believed in me that I was only telling the truth and needed that lawyerly defense against an overzealous and deceitful prosecutor, he did not stick up for me. Because Bill is a part time judge, does he play judge with his clients? And I sincerely question that Bill suffered cognitive impairment from his stroke, due to his erratic behavior. It is with heavy heart that I write this. Maybe your situation is different, where you know in your heart of hearts you are guilty, then Bill will smooze some sort of deal for you. This greatly cost me personally as well as the thousands Bill took in fees.

Nur osman

Jan 09, 2025

Man, where can I even start? I got a crazy ticket for speeding and I have a commercial driver license and I thought my license was in jeopardized and I was able to get in contact with Bill and Bill was able to take care of everything if you ever get a ticket in the state of Washington area hit up bill and he will take care of you once again thank you so much appreciate it.

Aliyah G

Jan 20, 2024

Bill was very helpful with my legal needs. I was feeling very confused and he explained very clearly what I needed to do next and what the upcoming process would be to solve my legal issues. Would definitely use him again in the future.

Stefan Sochniy

Aug 20, 2021

I’m a CDL holder, and I got a ticket for not wearing a seat belt in a semi truck. My friend sent me to this office, and Bill really helped me out! My ticket was dismissed! It is like the citation never even happened! By the way, I was out of country when Bill was taking care of my citation! Very happy with the results and I really recommend this attorney for CDL drivers in Washington! Thanks, Bill!